In Short: Swiss carbon offset giant, XYZ Carbon, has faced scrutiny and allegations related to its forest protection projects. Environmental watchdogs have raised concerns about the company’s carbon offsetting practices, particularly in the area of forest conservation. These allegations have prompted investigations into the authenticity and effectiveness of XYZ Carbon’s projects, raising doubts about their credibility in the carbon offset market. This situation underscores the importance of transparency and robust verification processes in the carbon offset industry to ensure the integrity of environmental initiatives and their impact on climate change mitigation efforts.
In Detail : South Pole, the world’s leading seller of carbon offsets, has been forced to suspend a flagship forest protection project in Zimbabwe amid allegations of exaggerated claims. Around one-fifth of the Swiss firm’s staff could also lose their jobs, according to media reports.
Carbon offsets allow firms and individuals to compensate for the carbon emissions they create – through, for example, an airplane flight or a building project – by paying to pull carbon out of the air elsewhere. Voluntary offsets have developed into a billion-dollar global market.
Last week the Washington, D.C.-based certification body Verra, the world’s leading carbon standard setter for the offsets market, announced it had launched an investigation into the Kariba REDD+ forest conservation project in northern Zimbabwe, one of South Pole’s largest climate protection projects. REDD stands for “Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries”.
This follows a critical report published on October 16 by the NewYorkerExternal link magazine, entitled “The Great Cash-for-Carbon Hustle”, which claimed South Pole sold millions of credits for carbon reductions that weren’t real.
In a statementExternal link, Verra said on October 17 that it had been “deeply disturbed” by the magazine’s allegations, which had “raised serious questions about the carbon-offsetting firm South Pole and the Kariba project in Zimbabwe”. The non-profit certification body said it had launched an investigation into the project, which would remain on hold, along with “any further credit issuances” until the probe is complete.
South Pole, which has vehemently denied that it has knowingly sold worthless CO2 certificates, toldExternal link Swiss public radio, SRF, that it would give full support to Verra’s probe and that the company’s role in the Kariba project would be “actively reviewed” in light of the revelations.
Kariba REDD+, which was started in 2011, is one of the world’s first large-scale forest protection projects, designed to conserve 785,000 hectares (1.94 million acres) of woodland in northern Zimbabwe. South Pole’s flagship has been a major beneficiary of carbon credits, as big firms fund projects that claim to remove carbon from the atmosphere to offset their own emissions. Multinationals such as Gucci, Nestlé and Volkswagen have voluntarily offset their emissions by investing in the project, according to Swiss public television SRF.
By March 2023, companies had bought 23 million credits from Kariba making it the second-largest project globally and generating millions for the Swiss climate firm, according to Bloomberg. A carbon credit represents a ton of climate-warming carbon dioxide or its equivalent either removed from the atmosphere or prevented from entering it in the first place.
Criticism and difficulties
The Kariba project led to the spectacular growth of South Pole, but the Zimbabwe project and carbon offset schemes more generally have faced mounting criticism and difficulties in recent months.
StudiesExternal link published in JanuaryExternal link and March by various news organisationsExternal link showed that South Pole, along with Verra, were linked to forest protection credits that did not deliver the promised carbon savings.
Follow-up research into the Kariba project by SRF, in collaboration with the German weekly Die ZeitExternal link and the Dutch research collective Follow the MoneyExternal link, published in July 2023, revealed that only a fraction of promised investments in Zimbabwe could be verified on site.
Several firms have reportedly been pulling out of the Kariba scheme. In May, The Guardian newspaper reportedExternal link that Gucci had ended its collaboration with South Pole and the forest in Zimbabwe.
More widely, an international team of scientists and economists led by the University of Cambridge and VU Amsterdam found that millions of carbon credits are based on crude calculations that inflate the conservation successes of voluntary REDD+ projects. Most carbon offset schemes are significantly overestimating the levels of deforestation they are preventing, the according to the study which was publishedExternal link in the journal Science in August.
Carbon offset methodology is ‘not perfect’
Defending his company, South Pole CEO Renat Heuberger told Reuters they had followed the approved methodology for the Kariba project at all times.
“There is no other way to do deforestation projects. You cannot know ten years in advance what the deforestation rates will be,” he said in September.
Carbon credit certifier Verra, which controls around three-quarters of all voluntary credits worldwide, said it welcomed the scrutiny of the voluntary carbon market by journalists, scientists and environmental groups, while stressing its importance.